It is our opinion that the so-called plain Boxer (very little white) has for the last 40 years been ignored by non-breeder judges. Some have the mistaken idea that the lack of white markings is to be penalized. The standard states that "White markings should be of such distribution as to enhance the dog's appearance, but may not exceed one-third of the entire coat."
We are concerned that some judges have been interpreting that to mean "MUST be of such distribution...". Rather than as intended, "white markings WHEN PRESENT, SHOULD be of such distribution.."
The standard goes on to describe white markings on the head, "On the face, white may replace part of the otherwise essential black mask and may extend in an upward path between the eyes, but it must not be excessive, so as to detract from the Boxer expression."
Please note that a black mask is essential and they MAY have white as described. No Boxer should be penalized for lack of markings. The standard states "Faults-Unattractive or misplaced white markings". Lack of white is not a fault.
A number of good plain Boxers shown in recent years have been able to finish, however, almost all of their wins are from breeder judges. Some breeders would prefer the plain look, but we are asking the judging community simply to give the plain Boxer equal consideration and to reward them if they are the best in the ring. Many more plain Boxers would be shown if the owners felt they had an equal chance to win.
This notice is approved by the American Boxer Club Standards Committee:
John T. Connolly Chairman, Dr. David Abraham, Mrs. Dixie McCauley
